![](http://www.farmprogress.com/sites/farmprogress.com/files/styles/hp_top_stories_main_standard/public/1-ag-econ-barometer-sept-2020.jpg?itok=0GIWR1nS)
Farmer sentiment hit a post pandemic high in September, according to the Purdue University/CME Group Ag Economy Barometer. The index rose to a reading of 156, up 12 points from August and up 60 points from its 2020 low in April. The Current Conditions Index also saw an uptick, jumping 18 points to a reading of 142 in September, and the Future Expectations Index rose 9 points to a reading of 163. The Ag Economy Barometer is based on survey responses from 400 U.S. agricultural producers and was conducted Sept. 21-25.
This past month marked key changes in the agricultural economy. On Sept. 18, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced a second round of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (CFAP 2) payments for U.S. agricultural producers, and fall-harvested crop prices continued to strengthen considerably since late summer.
“In September, producers were more optimistic about both current conditions and the future for agriculture than they’ve been since the pandemic began,” said James Mintert, the barometer’s principal investigator and director of Purdue University’s Center for Commercial Agriculture. “A continued crop price rally and the announcement of the USDA’s Coronavirus Food Assistance Program payments appear to be fueling much of their optimism.”
However, that optimism did not completely carry over into perspectives toward the future of U.S. agriculture’s trade prospects. In September, 58% of respondents said they expect agriculture exports to increase over the next 5 years, down from 67% who felt that way in August. The shift was primarily due to more producers indicating they expect exports to remain about the same in the future, rather than increase. In a related question, producers were asked whether they expect China to fulfill the food and agricultural import requirements established in the Phase One trade agreement signed earlier this year. Farmers’ opinions were split, with less than half (47%) of respondents indicating they expect China to fulfill its commitment to import food and ag products from the U.S.
Given its increased attention in recent years, this month, producers were asked several questions about their intentions to use fall cover crops. Nearly 4 out of 10 corn/soybean producers in the September survey said they intend to plant at least some cover crops in fall 2020. As for their acreage intentions, over half (52%) said that they planned to plant cover crops on one-third or less of their corn/soybean acreage, 21% said they intend to plant between one-third to as much as two-thirds, and 27% intend to plant cover crops on more than two-thirds. Farmers who intend to plant cover crops this fall overwhelmingly (79%) said their primary reason for doing so was to improve soil health and crop yields, while just 1% of respondents said it was because of the availability of cost-share funds.
With many educational events and programs transitioning to online delivery, this month farmers were asked whether they have attended an online program and, if so, what aspects they liked and disliked. Twenty-two percent of respondents to the September survey said they attended an online educational program or field day this year. Respondents said they liked the flexible timing of attending and viewing the programs (27%) and the ability to choose topics of interest (21%). However, respondents overwhelmingly pointed to the lack of interaction with other attendees (40%), poor broadband connection (18%), and difficulty in asking questions (17%) as the top reasons they disliked these programs.
Read the full Ag Economy Barometer report.
This month’s report includes insight into farmers’ intentions toward making large investments in their farming operations in the coming year. The site also offers additional resources – such as past reports, charts and survey methodology – and a form to sign up for monthly barometer email updates and webinars.
Each month, the Purdue Center for Commercial Agriculture provides a short video analysis (see video below) of the barometer results and for even more information, check out the Purdue Commercial AgCast podcast. It includes a detailed breakdown of each month’s barometer, in addition to a discussion of recent agricultural news that impacts farmers. Available now.
The Ag Economy Barometer, Index of Current Conditions and Index of Future Expectations are available on the Bloomberg Terminal under the following ticker symbols: AGECBARO, AGECCURC and AGECFTEX.
The source is solely responsible for the information provided and is wholly owned by the source. Informa Business Media and all its subsidiaries are not responsible for any of the content contained in this information asset.
1-ag-econ-barometer-sept-2020.jpg
Type
Caption
Credits
Gating level
DataTable subpages
Media Image
![Ag Economy Barometer 1-ag-econ-barometer-sept-2020.jpg](http://www.farmprogress.com/sites/farmprogress.com/files/1-ag-econ-barometer-sept-2020.jpg)
<p>The improvement in the barometer and its two primary sub-indices occurred against the backdrop of USDA’s September 18th announcement of the second round of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program (CFAP 2) payments for U.S. agricultural producers. The program provides up to $14 billion in additional assistance to agricultural producers determined to have suffered from market disruptions and costs because of COVID-19. Program details were released on September 21st, just as data collection for this month’s survey began. Additionally, fall harvested crop prices strengthened from the time data was collected for the August to the September surveys, in a continuation of a rally that got underway in late summer. For example, in west-central Indiana cash corn prices rose nearly $0.20 per bushel from late August to late September, while cash soybean prices rose nearly $1 per bushel. The resulting revenue boost from these two sources likely provided much of the impetus for this month’s 18-point rise in the Index of Current Conditions and the 12-point rise in the Ag Economy Barometer.</p>
2-indicies-curent-conditions-future-expectations-ag-econ-barometer-Sept2020.jpg
Type
Caption
Credits
Gating level
DataTable subpages
Media Image
![Indices of current conditions and future expectations 2-indicies-curent-conditions-future-expectations-ag-econ-barometer-Sept2020.jpg](http://www.farmprogress.com/sites/farmprogress.com/files/2-indicies-curent-conditions-future-expectations-ag-econ-barometer-Sept2020.jpg)
<p>The Current Conditions Index, with a reading of 142, was 18 points higher compared to a month earlier and the Future Expectations Index rose 9 points to a reading of 163.</p>
3-farm-capital-investment-index.jpg
Type
Caption
Credits
Gating level
DataTable subpages
Media Image
![Farm capital investment index 3-farm-capital-expenditure.jpg](http://www.farmprogress.com/sites/farmprogress.com/files/3-farm-capital-expenditure.jpg)
<p>The improvement in current conditions helped make producers more confident that now is a good time to make large investments in their farming operations than they were in August. The Farm Capital Investment Index rose again in September to a reading of 73, the highest reading of 2020.</p>
4-machinery-purchases.jpg
Type
Caption
Credits
Gating level
DataTable subpages
Media Image
![Plans for farm machinery purchases 4-machinery-purchases.jpg](http://www.farmprogress.com/sites/farmprogress.com/files/4-machinery-purchases.jpg)
<p>Helping to confirm the optimism evident in the investment index, fewer producers in September than in August and prior months, said they planned to reduce their machinery purchases compared to a year earlier.</p>
5-farmland-price-expectations.jpg
Type
Caption
Credits
Gating level
DataTable subpages
Media Image
![Farmland price expectations 5-farmland-price-expectations.jpg](http://www.farmprogress.com/sites/farmprogress.com/files/5-farmland-price-expectations.jpg)
<p>Farmers’ optimism carried through to their perspective on farmland values over the upcoming year. More producers in September said they expect farmland values to rise over the next 12 months than in August. The longer-run optimism about farmland values expressed in August continued in September as the percentage of producers expecting farmland values to rise over the next 5 years was unchanged at 59%, which is still the highest reading of this year.</p>
6-cover-crop-planting.jpg
Type
Caption
Credits
Gating level
DataTable subpages
Media Image
![Cover crop planting 6-cover-crop-planting.jpg](http://www.farmprogress.com/sites/farmprogress.com/files/6-cover-crop-planting.jpg)
<p>Cover crop usage has received a lot of attention in recent years. To learn more about cover crop usage, this month’s survey included several questions on cover crops. Nearly 4 out of 10 corn/soybean producers in the September survey said they intend to plant at least some cover crops in fall 2020. Two-thirds of the farmers who intend to plant a cover crop this fall have been planting cover crops for more than four years whereas just 7 percent of respondents said this would be the first time they planted a cover crop on their farm.</p>
7-acreage-for-cover-crops.jpg
Type
Caption
Credits
Gating level
DataTable subpages
Media Image
![Acreage for cover crops 7-acreage-for-cover-crops.jpg](http://www.farmprogress.com/sites/farmprogress.com/files/7-acreage-for-cover-crops.jpg)
<p>Although nearly 40 percent of corn/soybean producers said they intend to plant cover crops this fall, most of them will only plant cover crops on a portion of their crop acreage. Just over half (52%) of the respondents using cover crops in 2020 said that they intend to plant cover crops on one-third or less of their corn/soybean acreage while 21 percent of the farms in the September survey said they intend to plant cover crops on one-third to as much as two-thirds of their corn/soybean acreage. The remaining 27 percent of producers planting cover crops this fall intend to do so on more than two-thirds of their corn/soybean acreage. Farmers who intend to plant cover crops this fall overwhelmingly (79%) said their primary reason for doing so was to improve soil health and crop yields, while just 1 percent of respondents said it was because of the availability of cost-share funds.</p>